Use cases

Scholarships that treat every student the same

Students apply on their phone, reviewers score without seeing names and the committee decides with the full picture.

Start from the templateScholarship

What these programmes need

  • Students who apply from a phone
  • Grades, essays and recommendation details
  • Blind review to reduce bias
  • Kind and clear results e-mails

How Juryline handles it

  • A mobile application form with autosave and file uploads
  • Names and contact details hidden from reviewers
  • Rubric with descriptions for each score so reviewers apply the same standard
  • Results e-mails, and the jury's feedback in each applicant's account

Questions

Can students edit their application after submitting?
If you allow it, until the deadline. Every submitted version is kept as a snapshot.
Can we send feedback with the results?
Yes. Jurors can write feedback for the applicant. After the results the applicant sees it in their account without the jurors' names, and the results e-mail points to it.