Juryline and Google Forms compared
Google Forms is free and familiar, and many calls start there. It collects answers well. Judging them happens elsewhere, usually in spreadsheets you build by hand.
Side by side
| Side by side | Juryline | Google Forms |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free up to 30 applications, then 290 EUR per programme | Free with a Google account |
| File uploads | Applicants sign in with a code from their e-mail, no Google account or password; files are checked and stored privately | Applicants must sign in to a Google account to upload files |
| Jury work | Assignment, conflicts, blind review and scoring built in | Not part of Forms; built in spreadsheets |
| Rankings | Raw and normalised, with a sealed protocol | Spreadsheet formulas you write and check |
| Results e-mails | To every applicant, with optional feedback | Sent by hand or with add-ons |
Facts about Google Forms checked on 27 October 2026 on its public website. Prices excl. VAT.
Google Forms may suit you better if
- You run a short form without files and without a jury
- Everyone involved already works in Google Workspace
- There is no budget at all and fewer than a handful of applications
Juryline fits if
- Applicants upload files and should not need a Google account
- More than one juror scores each application
- You need to show how the decision was made
- You want to stop copying data between forms, sheets and e-mails